Low bandwith general impression
I would love to hear your feedback on lightweight. Thanks. Anand.. I LOVE the new, low bandwidth version. I once spent more time downloading and moving the navTree than reading docs. Printing once was...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
I had seen the Lightweight view in the MSDN .Its Very nice. I want to write some of the lightweight views for my website.Can any one guide how to write Code for the lightweight view.Any Concepts i have...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
Just like Nicholas, I didn't know about the alternate views. I just learned about the low bandwidth view and I like that a lot until I clicked on "Provide feedback" and discovered that there's actually...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
I never knew of the alternate views; they're quite nice! I think I'll stick with the low bandwidth view, it's a lot cleaner than the default high-bandwidth view. I keep a small browser window open...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
Me too! I actually came here to complain about the low-bandwidth view, but the answer to my complaint is: use the lightweight view! Thanks!John Saunders WCF is Web Services. They are not two separate...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
Wow! I like that even more! The code boxes with the language tabs are spot on. If only VB code examples are included, I don't miss out (I primarily develop in C#, but I can understand VB well...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
Diggy,Thanks for your feedback. How do you like our new "lightweight" view? Please see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.xml(lightweight).aspx. This is a combination of Script free (low...
View ArticleLow bandwith general impression
I actually like the low bandwidth version better. In high bandwidth, having a bread crumb for accessing sub post (especially members, methods, etc.) is awkward. I think the low bandwidth version has...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....